Most communities were organized and recognized leadership structure during the pre-colonial period. For instance, the rulers in such communities directed and guided the members through the daily life challenges. As a result, people lived happily and interacted well with other members. Unity in the society enabled them to resist external aggression since the members sought to protect their community at all costs. Additionally, some communities managed to stand against colonialism due to the unity and organization that was witnessed on their territories. Today some of the communities are still organized and practice the virtues instilled in them before colonialism. Some people also gained political power through the tribal organization present in ancient times. This paper relies on the readings provided to examine how the Bedouin tribal organization continued to shape the political power even when the rulers settled away in the coastal towns.
The nature of Bedouin life was simple due to the presence of powerful rulers who ensured that the community was well organized. In addition, the rulers made sure that the citizens’ needs in life were met in a bid to win the trust of the members in their leadership (Onley & Khalaf, 2006). For instance, politics in Bedouin life kept on shifting due to increased desire of many people to exercise the power. Thus, the leaders went through rough times trying to use their leadership to administer the community. The rulers were flexible and managed to withstand the hard times and challenges of their reign by offering immediate and timely solutions. Flexibility is a desirable quality for a leader and it often enables them to respond to the demands of leadership faster. As a result, the Bedouin tribal organization set the pace and was emulated by other communities, rulers and those who wished to build their political power (Onley & Khalaf, 2006).
Likewise, the good relations between the rulers and the powerful people that controlled trade had impacted on the politics in the region positively. Leaders desire to achieve economic growth during their reign and to ensure that the subjects are economically empowered. In Bedouin tribal organization, rulers are seen to have established good relationships with the powerful merchants in the region. Additionally, the leadership in the organization sought the support of the kingdom. The efforts of the administration witnessed the kingdom became powerful and encouraged economic growth in the region. As a result, the leadership of the organization gained support from the local people. The critics did not find grounds to oppose the management since the rulers were delivering effective in the administration. The achievements of the Bedouin tribal organization shifted the political power to focus on the development but not the ability to convince the society (Sweet, 1964). Similarly, it became easier for the successors to administer control of the kingdom since the members of the community had been liberated and economically empowered.
It is also evident that the success of the communities was based on the ability of the leaders of the Bedouin tribal organization to initiate and maintain good relationships with governors and other neighboring communities (Onley & Khalaf, 2006). For instance, this was a challenge to the rulers at the coast, and most of them had to emulate the Bedouin rulers in a bid to gain political power. It was established that the rulers of the kingdom ensured they were on good terms with their assistants and the leaders of the neighboring societies. Hence, they were able to consult on important matters regarding the kingdom and the way to exercise control over their subjects. Friendly environment enabled the leaders to improve the leadership and perform their duties effectively, thus, gaining publicity. A political wing was shaped to embrace dialogue as opposed to criticism in a bid to develop the organization and achieve good governance. As a result, Bedouin tribal organization enjoyed several erasof stable leadership that made the kingdom grow and expand. It was hard for the colonies to penetrate and take over control of the communities due to the streamlined and orderly politics of succession in the region. In that situation, people recognized the importance of good political will and good governance.
In the same way, the Bedouin tribal organizations saw the political scenario in the region change through the leaders’ dedication and commitment to foster the local culture. The Bedouins were allowed to practice their culture; and this factor contributed to the elimination of revolts in the communities. In addition, the locals understood their rights and privileges giving the rulers ample time since people knew what to expect from them. Even after the settlement of the foreigners at the coast, the Bedouins were not moved since they had already streamlined leadership in the region (Khaldun, 2004). On the other hand, the foreign culture did not affect their way of life because the communities treasured their culture and could not let it be washed away. Therefore, whoever wished to exercise power over the communities had no option other than to adopt the way life of the natives. That is why the Bedouin tribal organization became firm and resisted external aggression.
Equally, the loyalty and honesty portrayed by the Bedouin rulers played a role in reforming the politics and political power in the region. For instance, the style of leadership changed rapidly in the area. The Bedouin leaders prioritized the interests of their subjects and were more like fathers than leaders. All the leaders performed their responsibilities efficiently and protected the community (Fandy, 2009). Additionally, all the rulers of the organization combined their efforts to ensure the communities were safe. The leadership supported the families as a way to seek support from the locals. As a result, the local rulers rose to respectable figures in the society. Through the Bedouin tribal organization, the nation learnt the benefits of honesty and integrity in leadership. For instance, the communities understood the need for leaders and their importance in the society. Until today, most communities appreciate the need for a leader and are organized (Fandy, 2009). People who sought political power re-examined their intentions and realigned them with the needs of the society.
Benefit from Our Service: Save 25% Along with the first order offer - 15% discount, you save extra 10% since we provide 300 words/page instead of 275 words/page
On the contrary, the Bedouin tribal organization hampered the development of political power in the region since the organization segregated other tribes. For instance, people from outside the organization could not be listened to. The Bedouins believed in themselves too much to that they could not open up to new ideas. As a result, it was difficult for non Bedouin people to control the communities in the organization. The notion is still evident today as some people do not appreciate leaders from other communities (Fandy, 2009). In addition, the organization was not willing to contribute to the development of the leadership of other communities in the region thus killing political power in the region.
The political organizations formed in ancient times were eye openers to the communities since they enabled people to exercise power and control the activities of the community. Furthermore, they caused the locals to understand the need and role of leadership in the society. Such organizations laid the foundation for today’s political power and activities. People were to be taught about the requirements and virtues of leader and were supposed to meet as it helped the societies acquire and develop political stability. It is evident that good leaders prioritize the interests of their subjects as seen in the leadership of Bedouin tribal organization. Unity and understanding amongst rulers is a tool for good governance since it allows the administrators to consult on leadership issues. Through consultations and dialogue, the leaders gain political power that is essential in leadership.